<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Decoding the Cheat Codes: &#8220;Lessons in Love&#8221; at antena</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chicagoweekly.net/2010/01/22/decoding-the-cheat-codes-lessons-in-love-at-antena/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chicagoweekly.net/2010/01/22/decoding-the-cheat-codes-lessons-in-love-at-antena/</link>
	<description>All Sides of the South Side</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 16:21:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fezzi</title>
		<link>http://chicagoweekly.net/2010/01/22/decoding-the-cheat-codes-lessons-in-love-at-antena/comment-page-1/#comment-17618</link>
		<dc:creator>Fezzi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 05:55:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicagoweekly.net/?p=2057#comment-17618</guid>
		<description>While I certainly don&#039;t agree with Haslett on all points, his interpretation of some of the works can hardly be judged &quot;wrong.&quot; It seems like Teti suggestions for Haslett&#039;s piece center around semantics and precisely defining what &quot;exact likeness&quot; and &quot;trendy&quot; mean. 
It&#039;s strange isn&#039;t it that Teti&#039;s comment lacks the exact substance that, though far from dazzling, makes Haslett&#039;s piece compelling. I don&#039;t mean to play the adulator&#039;s role here (I do think Haslett misunderstood Bringaker&#039;s piece), but comments like that which precedes mine are the self-congratulatory types that have made any expression of sincerity a point of liability for writers. 

At risk of perpetuating this viciously petty cycle, I will suggest that Teti might pause all this over-the-keyboard snorting to  perhaps reexamine her own critical integrity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I certainly don&#8217;t agree with Haslett on all points, his interpretation of some of the works can hardly be judged &#8220;wrong.&#8221; It seems like Teti suggestions for Haslett&#8217;s piece center around semantics and precisely defining what &#8220;exact likeness&#8221; and &#8220;trendy&#8221; mean.<br />
It&#8217;s strange isn&#8217;t it that Teti&#8217;s comment lacks the exact substance that, though far from dazzling, makes Haslett&#8217;s piece compelling. I don&#8217;t mean to play the adulator&#8217;s role here (I do think Haslett misunderstood Bringaker&#8217;s piece), but comments like that which precedes mine are the self-congratulatory types that have made any expression of sincerity a point of liability for writers. </p>
<p>At risk of perpetuating this viciously petty cycle, I will suggest that Teti might pause all this over-the-keyboard snorting to  perhaps reexamine her own critical integrity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Teti</title>
		<link>http://chicagoweekly.net/2010/01/22/decoding-the-cheat-codes-lessons-in-love-at-antena/comment-page-1/#comment-17550</link>
		<dc:creator>Teti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 01:40:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicagoweekly.net/?p=2057#comment-17550</guid>
		<description>Wow Tobi, you got some of those pieces all wrong. That was a Real Doll. And as you obviously missed, it&#039;s an exact likeness of the woman in the videos. Weird right? And those aren&#039;t &quot;trendy young Chicagoans.&quot; They&#039;re drunk Bears fans. Liking the Bears hasn&#039;t been trendy for some time friend. 

And the text on Bringaker&#039;s piece is a translation of a speech delivered by a high-ranking female politician in Norway, not the artist&#039;s views on immigration. 

I question your journalistic integrity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow Tobi, you got some of those pieces all wrong. That was a Real Doll. And as you obviously missed, it&#8217;s an exact likeness of the woman in the videos. Weird right? And those aren&#8217;t &#8220;trendy young Chicagoans.&#8221; They&#8217;re drunk Bears fans. Liking the Bears hasn&#8217;t been trendy for some time friend. </p>
<p>And the text on Bringaker&#8217;s piece is a translation of a speech delivered by a high-ranking female politician in Norway, not the artist&#8217;s views on immigration. </p>
<p>I question your journalistic integrity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

